Thursday, December 27, 2012

'Spartacus: War Of The Damned' Final Season Trailer: War Comes To Rome (VIDEO)

Spartacus War Of The Damned

'Spartacus: War Of The Damned' final season trailer.

The final season premiere of "Spartacus: War Of The Damned" is a month away, and Starz has released a new action-packed trailer for the gory gladiator drama.

Both the trailer above and Starz' official description of the season preview an epic war between the Spartacus-led rebels and the Roman army.

"The season opens and Gaius Claudius Glaber is dead. Many months have passed since his defeat, and the rebel army, led by Spartacus and his generals Crixus, Gannicus and Agron continue to amass victories over Rome. With the rebel numbers swelling to thousands of freed slaves, and Spartacus more determined than ever to bring down the entire Roman Republic, the horde become a force that challenges even the mighty armies of Rome. Together, the rebels engage in one bloody skirmish after another and prepare for the inevitable: a full out war."

Newcomers Simon Merrells and Todd Lasance join the cast this season as Marcus Crassus and Julius Caesar. Liam McIntyre returns as Spartacus after taking on the role in "Spartacus: Vengeance" in the wake of Andy Whitfield's tragic death from non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

"Spartacus: War of the Damned" premieres Friday, January 25 at 9 p.m. ET on Starz.

Earlier on HuffPost:

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/25/spartacus-war-of-the-damned_n_2362357.html

louisville lotto numbers susan powell megamillions winners university of louisville louisville ky final four

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Flights hit again as snowstorms continue

The large storm system that created dangerous road conditions and white-outs in the Midwest is moving out of the Northeast. Cold air is on the way, however, bringing lake-effect snow across southwestern New York. Weather Channel meteorologist Chris Warren reports.

By Ian Johnston, NBC News

Snowstorms continued to rage on both coasts Saturday, causing further problems for holiday travelers across the country with hundreds of flights delayed or canceled.

The National Weather Service issued a series of winter storm warnings early Saturday for parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York and Ohio on the East Coast and also parts of Northern California and Oregon on the West.

As of 6:15 a.m. ET Saturday, some 470 flights had been delayed and 62 canceled, according to the website flightstats.com.

Chicago?s O?Hare International Airport was the worst affected with a total of 9 canceled arrivals or departures and 57 delayed flights, according to the website?s figures.

On Friday, nearly 700 flights were canceled and 9,300 delayed across the country by late afternoon, flightstats reported.

Thousands of flights disrupted across US as storm hits Northeast

Much of the Midwest is digging out after the first major snowstorm of the season dumped more than a foot of snow in some areas. Meanwhile, cancellations and delays are causing problems for travelers heading home for the holiday. NBC's John Yang reports.

Airport delays from NYC to DC?
Weather.com said
the storm was likely to linger over northern New England during the weekend.

?Winds will be the most intense from parts of southern New England and New York to the Mid-Atlantic on Saturday,? it said. ?Gusts could reach 40 or 50 mph at times during the afternoon, which may result in airport delays from New York City to D.C. In addition, isolated power outages and tree damage cannot be rule out as well.?

?Farther to the west, the Great Lakes snowbelts and Appalachians will continue to see wind-whipped snow on Saturday,? Weather.com added. ?The classic snowbelt locations will see the highest storm total snowfall amounts (northeast Ohio, northwest Pa., southwest N.Y., W.V. mountains, for example).?

It warned people in those areas to be prepared for winter driving conditions with ?sudden reductions in visibility? due to the weather possible.

At Chicago's O'Hare airport, travelers who spent Thursday night there included Patricia Oliver, who called her attempt to get from California to Waterloo, Iowa, "a nightmare."

"They keep pushing us and bumping us and booting us back," she told NBCChicago.com. "We slept two nights on the floor."

Mike Quieto traveled three hours on a bus to get to O'Hare, only to find out his flight was canceled. "I found out from checking my cellphone, and they didn't announce that until after the bus had already gotten here," Quieto told NBCChicago.com.

More than a foot of snow
The NWS warned the bad weather was likely to continue.

?A significant winter storm continues to work its way through the Northeast tonight bringing heavy snows and strong winds to the region,? the National Weather Service?s website said late Friday.

?Snows are forecast to continue tomorrow [Saturday] with totals exceeding a foot in some areas,? it added.

On Thursday, two people were killed and seven injured in a 30-vehicle pileup on Interstate 35 in Iowa. Drivers were blinded by blowing snow and didn't see vehicles that had slowed or stopped, causing a chain reaction of crashes, state police said.

The storm was also blamed for traffic deaths in three other states: two deaths each in Nebraska and Wisconsin; and one in Kansas.

In Utah, a woman who tried to walk for help after her car became stuck in snow died Tuesday night.

The West Coast was also seeing stormy weather.

The NWS said several inches of rain along with several feet of snow in elevated areas were expected in California and Oregon this weekend.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

?

Source: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/22/16086480-hundreds-of-flights-hit-again-as-snowstorms-continue?lite

willie nelson khloe kardashian Wreck It Ralph Hunter Hayes Movember USC shooting

Find The Hidden Money In Your Business | Name.com Blog: domain ...

FIND THE HIDDEN MONEY IN YOUR BUSINESS

It?s a common thought that the best way to increase profits in any business is to either work more and get more done, or to cut costs by lowering overhead. These aren?t bad ideas. Getting more clients or customers is always a good thing. And surely lowering the cost of supplies, rent, and other monthly expenses is also a feasible method to increase the amount of money you can take home every month.

The problem with these tactics is that they are too limited. Getting more customers is always welcomed, but more money also has to be invested to gain those customers. A bigger sales team is needed in many cases, depending on the business. Internet marketing tactics have to be amped up to increase production in order to reach more consumers. This could mean paying for additional ads to place on search results or websites, or using extra man power to reach out to people directly through emails or social media.

Lowering overhead also has its pitfalls. How much fat can you trim before the company starts paying a price? Most businesses have ways they could reduce spending, but after a while, all that can be cut has been cut. At that point, there?s not much further you can do.

Luckily, there is an answer in this situation. Companies can learn ways to make more money, if they keep doing the same things they?re already doing. What if you could increase profits without doing any more marketing than you are right now? Sounds pretty enticing, right? Even better, it wouldn?t require that you begin firing employees or trimming expenses out of your budget. You can ?find? money hidden in your business that has been there all along, but which you may have been ignoring.

Then concept isn?t all that out there when you get down to the nuts and bolts of it. The premise of finding money that has been undiscovered in your business involves working smarter instead of harder. You?ve undoubtedly heard this expression a dozen times before, but you may not have really understood what it meant or how you could go about implementing it in your own business. You may have even assumed that only lazy people used that mantra to excuse themselves from doing any real work. This couldn?t be farther from the truth.

So, how can you ?find? money hiding in your business? Follow these steps:

Analyze where your money is going.?It?s amazing how many business owners or managers spend money month after month on things that simply aren?t working for them. Maybe you have hired a social media team because every business has?to have a Facebook page, but your target audience has no Facebook presence. Does this make sense? It doesn?t mean you have to stop using that money, but that you should come up with a plan for using it more wisely.

Once you know where the money is going, figure out where it needs to go instead. Sometimes you may already be employing the right strategies, but you might simply be doing them in the wrong way. For instance, let?s say you send bi-annual direct mailers and get a 2% response rate. That isn?t too bad, at first glance. After all, you make money from each campaign, so you?re fairly happy with it. Conventional wisdom would say that in order to make more from each campaign, you must send out more mailers. Unfortunately, this is where many businesses drop the ball.

It?s not always necessary to send more mailers (or letters, or emails, or phone calls) to increase profits. You might be able to make more money by sending the exact same number of items with each campaign, in fact. How? You need to make them as targeted as possible.

This will require more research and a time investment on your part. The more specific you can get in your marketing efforts, the better your results may be. For instance, if you?re selling life insurance policies, you may have several target audiences to tackle. Instead of sending them all the same marketing collateral, send them each one tailored for their unique situation. This may include senior citizens who want to leave their families with peace of mind, and new parents who want to make sure their kids are secure.

You should also trim your list. Most companies send plenty of materials to targets who are not interested in their products at all. This not only can be annoying for those receiving mounds of junk mail, but it?s also a waste of money. If a person doesn?t fit into one of your targeted groups as being a prime candidate for purchasing what you have to offer, leave them off.

Get more from your existing customers.?Some business spend equal time sending coupons and special offers to those who have never purchased, those who have purchased once or twice, and those who are loyal customers. This is a mistake. Always send more offers to those who have shown to like your products and your business. They will be much more likely to purchase again, even if they?ve already done so recently.

To take this further, instead of investing time or money sending offers to those with a lower level of interest, spend it on sending valuable customers exclusive offers instead. You might keep track of their birthday and send an offer for a free gift or huge discount. If a customer has purchased items for young children several times in the past, you can send them offers for their children, or even for their children?s birthdays.

There may be other tactics you can employ depending on your business. Your goal is merely to figure out where your funds would be best spent, and to target your efforts as much as possible. This will not only make your business more efficient, but will also help increase your profits without you having to invest more up front.

Categories: startmybiz | Permalink

Source: http://www.name.com/blog/startmybiz/2012/12/find-the-hidden-money-in-your-business/

paranormal activity 4 love and hip hop 2012 nfl mock draft iowa caucus lemonade diet steve jobs action figure chris jericho

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Egypt's Alexandria gripped by feud over future

FILE - In this Friday, Dec. 14, 2012 file photo, opponents of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi hold pamphlets urging a "no vote" on a constitutional referendum as cars burn during clashes between supporters and opponents of President Mohammed Morsi in Alexandria, Egypt. This Mediterranean city with a cosmopolitan heritage, now an Islamist stronghold, is often seen as a predictor of Egypt?s trends. So a ferocious battle between sword-wielding Islamists and rock-throwing opponents outside a revered mosque last weekend could be a sign of the volatile direction the country?s crisis is taking: Islamists are threatening to take up arms, and young, secular activists are growing bolder in rebelling against their domination. (AP Photo, File)

FILE - In this Friday, Dec. 14, 2012 file photo, opponents of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi hold pamphlets urging a "no vote" on a constitutional referendum as cars burn during clashes between supporters and opponents of President Mohammed Morsi in Alexandria, Egypt. This Mediterranean city with a cosmopolitan heritage, now an Islamist stronghold, is often seen as a predictor of Egypt?s trends. So a ferocious battle between sword-wielding Islamists and rock-throwing opponents outside a revered mosque last weekend could be a sign of the volatile direction the country?s crisis is taking: Islamists are threatening to take up arms, and young, secular activists are growing bolder in rebelling against their domination. (AP Photo, File)

In this Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012 photo, 87-year old Sheik Ahmed el-Mahalawi, right, speaks during a press conference as Sheik Said Abdel-Azim, left, a leader of al-Dawa al-Salafiya, in Alexandria, Egypt. A politicized religious sermon by a prominent ultraconservative cleric set off angry protests, where sword-wielding supporters of Sheik el-Mahalawi clashed for hours with rock-throwing opponents. In an unimaginable twist, the cleric was locked up inside for over 12 hours during the battle, while opponents accused his supporters of detaining protesters and beating them inside the mosque. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)

FILE - In this Friday Dec. 14, 2012 file photo, injured men take shelter during clashes between supporters and opponents of President Mohammed Morsi in Alexandria, Egypt. This Mediterranean city with a cosmopolitan heritage, now an Islamist stronghold, is often seen as a predictor of Egypt?s trends. So a ferocious battle between sword-wielding Islamists and rock-throwing opponents outside a revered mosque last weekend could be a sign of the volatile direction the country?s crisis is taking: Islamists are threatening to take up arms, and young, secular activists are growing bolder in rebelling against their domination.(AP Photo/Ahmed Ramadan, File)

FILE - In this Friday, Dec. 14, 2012 file photo, cars burn during clashes between supporters and opponents of President Mohammed Morsi in Alexandria, Egypt. This Mediterranean city with a cosmopolitan heritage, now an Islamist stronghold, is often seen as a predictor of Egypt?s trends. So a ferocious battle between sword-wielding Islamists and rock-throwing opponents outside a revered mosque last weekend could be a sign of the volatile direction the country?s crisis is taking: Islamists are threatening to take up arms, and young, secular activists are growing bolder in rebelling against their domination. (AP Photo/Ahmed Ramadan, File)

In this Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012 photo, Medhat el-Haddad, a prominent Alexandria leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, speaks during a press conference, in Alexandria, Egypt. A politicized religious sermon by a prominent ultraconservative cleric set off angry protests, where sword-wielding supporters of the 87-year old Sheik Ahmed el-Mahalawi clashed for hours with rock-throwing opponents. In an unimaginable twist, the cleric was locked up inside for over 12 hours during the battle, while opponents accused his supporters of detaining protesters and beating them inside the mosque. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)

ALEXANDRIA, Egypt (AP) ? The Qaed Ibrahim mosque, revered by Alexandrines as the embodiment of their Mediterranean city's cosmopolitan heritage, has become a battleground between the two visions fighting over the future of Egypt, literally.

When prominent ultraconservative cleric Sheik Ahmed el-Mahalawi denounced opponents of the Islamist-backed draft constitution as "followers of heretics" in a sermon, angry protests erupted, turning into clashes between sword-wielding supporters of the cleric and rock-throwing opponents, while police did nothing. The 87-year-old el-Mahalawi was trapped inside for over 12 hours during the battle, while protesters outside tried to free several of their comrades detained ? and beaten, they say ? in the mosque.

Afterward, powerful Islamist groups in Egypt's second largest city threatened to deploy their own armed militias in the streets to protect their symbols.

Alexandria is often seen as a predictor of Egypt's trends ? one prominent local writer, Alaa Khaled, calls it "Egypt's subconscious," where the country's true nature comes out.

So the battle at Qaed Ibrahim last Friday could be a sign of the volatile direction Egypt's political crisis is taking. On one side, Islamists threaten to take up arms to defend what they call their right to propagate Islamic rule. On the other, a cocktail of young, secular, revolution-minded activists have grown bolder in rebelling against their domination, willing to directly assault long untouchable religious symbols like mosques.

Ostensibly, Egypt's crisis is centered on a controversial draft constitution that would bring greater rule by Islamic law. A first round of voting in a referendum on the charter took place last Saturday, and the final round is to be held the coming Saturday ? with the "yes" vote so far ahead by a slim 56 percent margin.

But more broadly, it is a conflict of visions. The opposition accuse President Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood and his Islamist allies of steamrolling anyone who disagrees with them and imposing their domination. Many of Morsi's supporters, in turn, vow to defend "God's law" and accuse liberals and secular opponents of trying to subvert their election victories the past year. Both sides have brought mass crowds into the streets around the country the past weeks.

The Qaed Ibrahim clash represents an intensified version of that conflict, centered on a battle for Alexandria itself.

In ancient times, Alexandria was a symbol of enlightenment. In the first half of the 20th Century, it was synonymous with modernist, multicultural ambitions for Egypt. In the past two decades, the sprawling city of 5 million became a stronghold of Egypt's most ultraconservative Islamists. With last year's uprising that toppled autocrat Hosni Mubarak, it has also become a hotbed for revolution movements.

Now there is a backlash against the Islamists' domination of the city, fueled by young activists. For years, Alexandrines allowed the city to grow more conservative, but now that the conservatives have political power, more residents see them as a threat, said Khaled, the writer.

"Alexandria is very angry. People are feeling that a new style is being imposed on them," he said. "What is happening here is the beginning of a conflict that can develop in other places." In line with the city's anti-authority fervor, hundreds of women blocked a street with a protest on the referendum day, accusing a judge of blocking them from voting against the constitution.

Islamists are rising to face the challenge.

The day after the clashes, leaders of the top Islamist groups in Alexandria, held a press conference on the roof of el-Mahalawi's home, outraged by what they called an attack on an esteemed cleric and the mosque itself. The leaders ? some in clerical turbans and robes, others in suits, most with long beards ? billed themselves as the "Agency for Unifying Islamist Ranks," representing groups ranging from the Brotherhood to the ultraconservative Salafi movement to the radical Gamaa Islamiya, which once waged a terror campaign against the regime but later renounced violence.

"We never imagined the day will come that we will gather to speak about an attack on God's house," Medhat el-Haddad, a prominent local Brotherhood leader, screamed. "Is this the revolution? Are these the revolutionaries who want to lead Egypt in the next phase?"

One cleric sneered that police would have been quicker to protect "a belly dance club or a church."

Turning red in the face, Refaat Abu Assem, of the Gamaa Islamiya, addressed the interior minister, who heads the police.

"If you don't carry out your duty, we are able to protect our mosques, figures," he said. "We now tell you we will do it, and we can."

In Cairo, a leading figure in the Brotherhood's political party, Essam el-Erian, seemed to echo that call, saying that for the first time the group was thinking of arming its guards to protect its offices, which have come under attack by opposition crowds repeatedly the past weeks.

"This people are able to defend themselves, their country and their choice," el-Erian said on Mehwer TV.

The Islamists' comments fueled fears that they were building up militias to crush their critics ? at a time when Egypt is awash with weapons smuggled in from conflict-torn Libya.

The host of one of Egypt's most prominent TV political talk shows, Ibrahim Eissa, accused the new Islamist rulers of weakening official security agencies and allowing vigilante groups to operate. "There is political cover for these groups supporting and using terror and fear against the opponents of Morsi, and no one can touch them because this is as the presidency likes it," he said Sunday.

On Tuesday, el-Erian told Sky News Arabia that it "was nonsense" to take his comment to mean creating militias.

For the activists' side, the Alexandria clashes were an attempt to push back against Islamist control.

The Qaed Ibrahim mosque, a prominent landmark overlooking the Mediterranean built in the 1940s by an Italian architect, stands on a main square that was the epicenter of Alexandria's protests against Mubarak and against military rule after his fall ? the city's equivalent of Cairo's Tahrir Square. The mosque and the square were considered a place where Alexandrines could mass regardless of political affiliation.

Activists say el-Mahalawi and his supporters broke an unspoken agreement to avoid divisive politics in the mosque and tried to turn it into a die-hard Islamist center. For weeks, el-Mahalawi used sermons for Islamist political campaigning and his supporters have been squeezing out other worshippers, said Mustafa Sakr, a 20-year-old activist.

"Some have stopped coming to pray at this mosque," he said.

The last straw, he said, was el-Mahalawi's sermon Friday on the eve of referendum voting, accusing the charter's opponents of causing chaos and campaigning for a "yes" vote. The sermon started a commotion in the mosque. The cleric's supporters lined up on the mosque walls to guard the entrances, clashing with worshippers who were praying on the outside grounds.

Protesters threw rocks at the line of supporters, who taunted the protesters, accusing them of being Christians, and made throat-slitting gestures, Sakr said. More Islamists in long beards moved in, waving swords and machetes at their rivals. Then the protesters attacked cars parked nearby believed to have brought in the Islamists's weapons, setting at least one on fire.

For hours, the mosque was surrounded. The Islamists say the protesters were trying to attack the mosque and el-Mahalawi inside. Sakr and other protesters say they were trying to retrieve three of protesters snatched by Islamists and locked inside.

At the Islamist press conference the next day, el-Mahalawi denied calling on worshippers to vote yes for the constitution ? though video posted online from the scene show him saying it in his sermon.

At the press conference, he praised his supporters, some of whom offered to come from other parts of the country with automatic weapons to defend him. He said his own appeals for restraint had prevented bloodshed.

"We are lucky to have this crowd," he said of his supporters. "We want these forces to be ready at all times ... and maintain discipline, because this will be a support for the police force, until it recovers."

Khaled, the Alexandria writer, said the Islamists are "creating a system within the system."

"Are they now planning to create neighborhoods for themselves, creating a Beirut?" he said in reference to the Lebanese capital at the height of its civil war.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2012-12-18-Egypt-Battle%20for%20Alexandria/id-ef6d4b4ed2fe49f48b86238c7da0b22c

aaliyah Empire State Building shooting Republican National Convention Karlie Redd guild wars 2 adrian gonzalez Jerry Nelson

Monday, December 17, 2012

Opening Anthropology: An interview with Keith Hart (Part 2 of 3 ...

This interview is part of an ongoing series about open access (OA), publishing, communication, and anthropology. ?The first interview in this series was with Jason Baird Jackson (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3). ?The second interview, with Tom Boellstorff, is here. ?The third installment of this OA series is with Keith Hart.*? See Part 1 of this interview here.

Ryan Anderson: Earlier you referred to OA as ?a strategy of resistance to privatization of the commons?.? Can you elaborate on that point?

Keith Hart: I meant that private property is still the great unresolved contradiction of modern society, not least because its ubiquity often makes society invisible. For Rousseau, the invention of private property was the origin of social inequality. The liberal Enlightenment looked to anthropology for the knowledge needed to realize a democratic revolution against the Old Regime. Morgan (followed by Engels) used Rousseau?s framework to make the history of unequal society the main object of a democratic anthropology. More recently, L?vi-Strauss, Wolf and Goody renewed this tradition, each in their own way. Now David Graeber has taken it up again. But the ethnographic turn made this a marginal current in twentieth century anthropology.

I grew up in a working class district of Manchester. The doors of our houses had to be kept open for neighbors to come in and out as they wished. Even inside the house, bedroom and bathroom doors were never closed. Privacy was the opposite of being open to the free flow of solidarity. I thought that spirit had gone forever, but I found it again when I moved to France fifteen years ago. Here the tradition of people occupying the streets (manifestation) is very much alive and the notion of a public sphere that belongs to all is palpable.

In my lectures I refer to the example of a Masai warrior who works as a nightwatchman in Nairobi. He buys a watch with his wages. What could be more personal or private than a wristwatch, attached to your skin? He returns to the village and a friend immediately says ?Give me your watch?. He has to give him the watch. Why? The solidarity of age-mates, so vital for the defense of the village?s cattle, is undermined by distinctions based on private property. In our societies, we take private ownership for granted. The institutions that secure it for us are hidden most of the time. Only when we are relieved of our possessions or a contract is broken do we realize that we normally depend on the law; and we complain about the inadequacy of police protection.

Modern economics insists that individual exchange is universal, but the barter myth of money?s origins is based on the assumption of private property. All that is missing from barter is the money. In fact private property law has been invented independently only two or three times, by the Romans, the Chinese and maybe the Aztecs. It was invented by centralized states to secure the property of traders. The Romans made a distinction between rights in persons and rights in things. Ownership was normally based on having made something or using it; and this right was secured by being a member of a particular social group. Traders neither made nor used what they owned, but the state guaranteed their right to the thing against local brigandage, as they would put it.

There has never been a society so committed to private property as the United States and this goes with unusually weak social protection by the state. In the movie Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore asks why American society is so prone to gun violence. He inserts a cartoon at one point to explain that it is because of the history of racism. But the cause is more plausibly an unchecked system of markets based on private property without the social protection of an effective welfare state. This also accounts, in my view, for the apparent anomaly of the US being the most modern society and the most religious. God and guns fill in for the welfare state. Canadians are both secular and less violent. The Europeans are hardly religious at all.

The euro crisis also hinges on privatization. After the Cold War ended, the Europeans decided that the winning side was the free market, forgetting their own long history of formal and informal public institutions shoring up markets. So they introduced a new currency to make a single market, without addressing the gap between North and South or developing fiscal institutions in common. They supposed that markets based on private property would lead them to political union. (The Americans, in contrast, fought a civil war before centralizing their currency.) The basic flaws in all this were hidden by the credit boom, but the financial crisis brought them out with a vengeance.

This is why I spoke of Marx?s early journalism. It underpinned his lifelong attempt to expose and replace an economy founded exclusively on private property. I am suggesting that, if we are distressed by what is going on in the universities today, we need to stand back and address fundamental issues first.

RA: You also highlighted what you call the tension between the maintenance of an intellectual commons and the conservation of ideas as private property.

KH: We still think of private property as belonging to living persons and oppose private and public spheres on that basis. But what makes property private is holding exclusive rights against the world. Abstract entities like governments and corporations, as well as individuals, can thus hold private property. We are understandably confused by this, especially since the corporations? rise to public power rests on collapsing the difference between real and artificial persons in economic law. This constitutes a major obstacle not only to the practice of democracy, but also to thinking about it. Sadly, it has become commonplace for intellectuals to obscure the distinction between living persons and abstractions, as well as between persons, things and ideas.

Private property has not only evolved from individual ownership to predominately? corporate forms, but its main point of reference has also shifted from ?real? to ?intellectual? property, that is from material objects to ideas. This is partly because the digital revolution in communications has led to the economic preponderance of information services whose reproduction and transmission is often costless or nearly so. A similar sleight of hand is at work here as in the claim to corporate personhood. If I steal your cow, its loss is material, since only one of us can benefit from its milk. But if I copy a CD or DVD, I am denying no-one access to it. Yet corporate lobbyists depend on this misleading analogy to influence courts and legislators to treat duplication of their ?property? as ?theft? or even ?piracy.?

The term ?information feudalism? is highly appropriate for our era. Human work was once conceived of as collective physical energy, as so many ?hands?. The internet has raised the significance of intangible commodities. Now that production of things is being replaced by information services, labor is increasingly understood as individual creativity, as subjectivity. And it is this shift that has been captured by big money in the claim that ?intellectual property? deserves closer regulation in the interest of its owners.

The fight is on to save the commons of human society, culture and ecology from the encroachments of corporate private property. This is no longer just a question of conserving the earth?s natural resources, although it is definitely that too, nor of the deterioration of public services left to the mercies of privatized agencies. Increasingly we buy and sell ideas; and their reproduction is made infinitely easier by digital technologies. So the larger corporations have launched a campaign to assert their exclusive ownership of what until recently was considered shared culture to which all had free and equal access. Across the board, separate battles are being fought over music, movies, literature, software, GMOs, pharmaceuticals, the internet and the universities without any real sense of the common cause that they embody.

RA: In your opinion, is this a conflict that can be resolved?? Is there some sort of middle ground solution here?

KH: Well, we do have to take on the corporations, but my answer is yes, there is a middle ground solution and it is one we are well-placed as anthropologists to make use of. Durkheim believed that individuality was more developed in societies with an advanced division of labor because of their increased interdependence. The problem is that this pervasive individualism makes it harder for us to perceive the work of society in shaping our lives. This is especially so in a regime of private property, where the collective forces underpinning individual ownership are for the most part invisible. His key idea was ??the non-contractual element in the contract??. In a market transaction, only the buyer and seller appear to be involved; but it rests on an invisible array of institutions ? of state law, social customs and shared history ? without which it could not take place. How can people be made more aware of the importance of this social glue in their lives?

Some three decades later, Marcel Mauss wrote his famous essay, The Gift, which may be seen as a renewal of his uncle?s mission to make the non-contractual element in the contract visible. But he focused on a range of phenomena that were more prominent in ??archaic?? societies than our own, systems of competitive gift-exchange. He saw these as an individualized variant of a more general form of obligatory community service (prestation). The principle of giving with the expectation of a return persists in societies dominated by capitalist markets. A cooperative socialist, Mauss worked for an anti-capitalist revolution, but one based on developing the human dimensions of market institutions that existed already. He considered the Bolshevik revolution?s violent repression of markets to have been a disaster.

For Mauss, being human always means reconciling freedom and obligation, individual and collective interests. The ??free gift?? is not the opposite of self-interested contracts. It is always interested and often a source of inequality. Nor is ??capitalism?? the whole story when it comes to the modern economy. The gift is the non-contractual element in the contract. By obscuring, marginalizing and even repressing the more humane aspects of markets as well as their intrinsic inequality, bourgeois ideology prevents us from seeing how our current practices might sustain new directions for the economy. Much more sustains the market than the exchange of spot contracts. Most contracts (notably relations of credit and debt) involve deferred payment and thus resemble gifts whose defining characteristic is delayed return. This is to say nothing of the role of institutions like the welfare state in capitalist societies.

Mauss introduced three new elements to his uncle?s original approach. First, he abandoned Durkheim?s sociological reductionism, seeking rather to identify social phenomena in their totality, a dynamic assemblage of persons, networks, groups, things and ideas more readily revealed through ethnography than by specialist disciplines. Archaic gift-exchange brings together individuals and communities, law and economy, magic and religion, art and technology. Mauss advocated an economic movement from below for contemporary societies, aiming at consumer democracy through a combination of cooperatives, mutual insurance and professional associations. The generosity of the archaic gift does not point to a non-market alternative, but rather to the humanity inherent in markets that remains to be liberated by such a modern movement.

Second, Durkheim oversimplified the contrast between primitive and modern societies. Against his uncle?s implicit evolutionism, Mauss held that all economies were plural in practice; indeed, the basic human economic arrangements co-exist in any society, a position later associated with Polanyi and revived by Graeber. It is counter-productive to imagine economic change as the radical replacement of one set of institutions by another. Third, Mauss had an inclusive vision of human history with the boundaries of local societies being pushed ever outwards. Both gift-exchange and markets extend society by taking members out of their locally grounded system of rights and interests to engage with foreigners. Markets and money in some form are universal, since no society can be self-sufficient. Where Malinowski opposed the Trobriand kula to money and markets, Mauss saw a parallel with the free market, at least with the invisible infrastructure of human expansiveness and trust that he believed made markets possible.

Mauss?s counter-intuitive idea that gifts and markets share a common human substance soon gave way to the old notion that they are each other?s opposite, now reified as ??gift economy?? versus ??market economy??, the very contrast that he wrote his essay to refute. He rejected brutal contrasts of this kind and that makes him an ideal starting-point in any search for a middle-ground between extremes of right and left.

?

In the final segment of this interview, we will bring these discussions about property, privatization, and the commons back to the issue of OA and the academy.? To be continued?

?

*Keith Hart lives in Paris with his family and co-directs the Human Economy research program at the University of Pretoria, South Africa (web.up.ac.za/humaneconomy). He is Professor of Anthropology Emeritus at Goldsmiths, University of London and has taught in a dozen universities on both sides of the Atlantic, for the longest time at Cambridge where he was Director of the African Studies Centre. He has published widely in economic anthropology, especially about money. Website: www.thememorybank.co.uk. Email: johnkeithhart {at} gmail(.)com. Facebook and Twitter: johnkeithhart.

Ryan Anderson is a graduate student in anthropology at the University of Kentucky. His dissertation research focuses on the politics of tourism development in Baja California Sur. He is the editor of the collaborative online project anthropologies, and also blogs at ethnografix. You can contact him at ethnografix at gmail dot com.

Source: http://savageminds.org/2012/12/16/opening-anthropology-an-interview-with-keith-hart-part-2-of-3/

neil armstrong little league world series us open tennis us open tennis aaliyah Empire State Building shooting Republican National Convention

Thursday, December 13, 2012

People In America In Nike Shox Financial Debt - The Belize Forums

People In America In Nike http://www.nikefreeshoenz.com/ Shox Financial Debt

Financial debt is a Nike Shox fact of existence in The us, producing debt relief a national obsession. A look for "debt relief" on Google pulls up over 34 million pages; on Yahoo and MSN, the overall is more than 12 million pages.

The average American house has $9,300 of charge card financial debt, however the discuss of earnings heading to reduced charge cheap nike free card debt has fallen to 0.3 percent.

The improve in individual financial debt cannot all be blamed on overspending. Right after adjusting for inflation, wages have been flat for your past five a long time although the price of essential merchandise and solutions like housing, meals, medical Nike Shox treatment and transportation have risen more than eleven percent in accordance with the Federal Reserve Boards most recent Survey of Client Finances.

Housing Debt

According to this research, the Washington Publish Nike Shox lately reported that,

The financial debt from the standard American household earning about $45,000 a calendar year rose 33.1 percent from 2001 to 2004, soon after adjusting for inflation? Housing debt has climbed notably because home prices have risen and Nike Free Run 3 online sale folks have borrowed from the equity in their homes. From 1989 to 2004, for example, the median mortgage loan financial debt more than doubled, from $46,900 to $96,000.

This refinancing trend is one with the main methods for debt relief. It requires several forms: first mortgage refinancing, 2nd mortgages, financial debt consolidation financial loans and house equity lines of credit rating. These mortgages could be possibly fixed-interest or adjustable-interest loans.

Many internet sites maintain abreast of existing rates of interest and offer a cost-free mortgage loan refinancing software that matches prospective debtors with the best financial loans based on aspects like credit rating history, FICO score, kind of home loan and size of mortgage. It is simpler to obtain than other types of borrowing due to the fact the bank loan is secured by tangible house. It tends to make better sense than borrowing towards the money worth of a life insurance policy or pulling money nike free sale from a retirement or 401(k) account.

New or refinanced mortgages do not really decrease financial debt, but they are able to restructure it in advantageous ways. Benefits incorporate: becoming able to spend off high-interest charge cards and other types of revolving debt; making home improvements that improve the market value with the property; having an individual month to month payment at a reduced interest rate. An additional additionally is that the curiosity on a home bank loan or home loan is generally tax deductible.

But do not wait as well lengthy to refinance. property falling 3.3 percent in the fourth cheap nike free run quarter of 2005.? Costs had been essentially flat or reduce through the quarter as inventories of houses available rose and their time invested in the marketplace lengthened, based on a survey of 149 markets by the National Association of Realtors,

Even if the Feds preserve raising interest rates, mortgage refinancing and house equity loans will nonetheless be the preferred kind of debt reduction for property owners who locate on their own within a monetary pinch. At a time once the countrywide cost savings price is below Nike Shox zero, property equity will be the only asset a lot of people have.

Source: http://www.belizeforum.com/belize/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=225569

cleveland plain dealer barry sanders barry sanders john scott jimmie johnson juan pablo montoya crash chardon high school shooting